.
Time for an Emancipation
Proclamation |
| [Reprinted from The
Freeman, September, 1942] |
Just what can be freely discussed in war time is always a puzzle.
Perhaps it is determined by the Government; more likely Chesterton's
formula gives the answer: "When modem sociologists talk of the
necessity of accommodating one's self to the trend of the time, they
forget that the trend of the time at its best consists entirely of
people who will not accommodate themselves to anything. At its worst it
consists of many millions of frightened creatures all accommodating
themselves to a trend that is not there."
By some mystery, "the trend" is again permitting discussion
of food for our starving allies in occupied countries. When so great a
figure as Herbert Hoover was bitterly denounced and swept aside as he
advocated food relief, in the period before Pearl Harbor, it seemed
unlikely that the subject could again be mentioned until after the war.
But the American Forum of the Air, on the evening of August 16, invited
Norman Thomas and Mary Hillyer (long-time Socialist comrades) to speak
on behalf of immediate feeding, while Dr. Frank Kingdon and Mrs.
Benjamin Watson were constrained to reply to them -- with righteous
heat. Newspaper radio columns announced the program in strong language:
"Europe is starving. Untold thousands in occupied countries
friendly to the United States are dropping in the streets for want of
food and medical supplies, while we are wondering just how much help to
give them without aiding Hitler and his gang."
It is regrettable, to many Georg-ists, that no great leader has
appeared, from their own or other moderate groups, to replace Norman
Thomas as a vanguard spokesman for free speech and common humanity at
times when other spokesmen are wanting. That is our fault, not his: give
him honor for fighting our battle. We might fight it better -- but we
don't.
He emphasized the appalling undernourishment in many countries, tout
especially the desperate situation in Greece.
Greece offers the most striking among the tragic mysteries of the day.
A few months after the United States entered the war, a neutral food
ship sailed to Greece from America, with assurance of safe passage from
both German and Allied authorities. No official explanation of this
divergence from previous policy seems to have been given, nor yet for
the news in August that three Swedish steamers, with grain, were sailing
from Montreal for Greece, "under safe conduct guarantees granted by
all the belligerent governments." But in May a clue had appeared.
Ten thousand of the starving dwellers on Greek islands of the Aegean
Sea, "including many refugees from Athens and other cities on the
Greek mainland," were reported to have crossed into Turkey, "in
frail small boats," and "by devious means, eluding Turkish
patrols. Half of them are in the Smyrna area, emaciated and
yellow-skinned from malnutrition. . . . Unless food is sent to the
islands soon, a tidal wave of Greeks may break upon the Turkish shores
with the probability that the situation will be getting out of hand. . .
. Panic is spreading among the islanders as they see only death from
starvation before them, and they will get across somehow. . . . Hundreds
of persons have been lost at sea, and others have been fired on by the
Turkish patrols." "Turkey, though short of food itself, has
decided to send . . . raisins, dried figs and fish to the islands."
Nothing was reported concerning any interference with this migration by
the Nazis, though other accounts tell of their using forced Greek labor.
It is the neutral neighbor country which has been stopping the refugees,
while "to encourage them to remain on the islands, Britain has sent
Canadian flour."
This helps to clear up the mystery of the food ships crossing the
blockade, despite all declarations that feeding is an aid to Hitler.
What lash or weapon in the hands of a Nazi taskmaster is so effective,
in extracting labor from conquered manpower, as the ultimatum: "Work
for us or we will withhold food from your children?" Even at the
expense of extra food to the Nazis, one would suppose that Allied
strategists might prefer to feed the children and give their fathers
courage to refuse labor, or better yet, get this manpower out from under
Hitler's control. But at the first proven example of accomplishing such
a feat on a large scale, what happens ? Refugees are driven back into
Nazi territory, and food is at long last sent to them, lest they cross
the line. Billions of dollars and millions of lives to keep the people
of Europe and Asia exactly where they are -- but not one cent to help
them escape from tyranny to any of the lands of the free.
Or are there such lands? Here in the story of the Aegean islanders, as
told by the Associated Press, is an item of universal familiarity: "A
few unscrupulous Greeks were cooperating with the Germans in making
money in the black market, buying up at small prices the property which
the departing islanders must sell to get passage money." Black
markets know no lines of blood or nationality. Wherever refugees go --
in Naziland or Democracy, now or next century -- will they find the same
black traffic in the right to set foot on earth?
A Freeman editorial of October, 1941, told us "How to
Smash Hitler," by offering to every one of his unwilling subjects "about
five acres of our millions and millions of unused acres." There was
nothing impractical about an exactly similar "war measure" in
1863, when Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, and
encouraged slaves to desert from the labor force of the enemy. The time
is ripe for a leader of equal vision to emancipate the slaves of Hitler.
The story of the Aegean proves once more an ancient fact: No barriers,
obstacles, or battle lines; no frontiers guarded only on one side by the
jailers of an oppressed people, will stop the oppressed from breaking
away, if there is any place on God's earth where men will permit them to
go. Is this a war for freedom, or is it a war to prevent tree migration?
Is it a war to "protect the innocent?" If so, and if Ranger
commandos can raid the continent for purposes of destruction, why not to
rescue the innocent?
|