.
[Reprinted from Land &
Liberty, Autumn 2000] |
OVER THIRTY YEARS after I first heard of Henry George, I find
myself heading a tiny charity that bears his name: a name that almost
nobody in Britain today knows or cares about. But a name-representing a
philosophy that more people than ever care about, concerning proper
economic relationships between human groups and our planet's endowment.
Research and public education into the implications for a modern age of
the ideas of Henry George are our work. We can only do it by engaging
with those outside our tiny "Georgist" domain who have the
tools of modern research and the ears of the public.
But even they don't listen, if we start by talking about The Man or his
Single Tax. So we become voices in a wilderness. And we develop what a
sympathetic preacher calls "the stridency that comes from not being
heard". Which does the cause no good.
MOST OF MY working life was spent as a military surveyor. Love of maps
and the need to keep fit led me to orienteering, a sport that involves
route planning and expert navigation. An orienteer soon learns some
basic lessons for life: In a complex world, the best route to one's goal
is often not the shortest -- and can sometimes begin in the opposite
direction to the destination. Stubborn persistence with a route that is
clearly wrong merely leads to further disaster. Maps (and route plans)
are a compromise, needing frequent update. There is never perfect
information. Standing still gets you nowhere!
LAND & LIBERTY is a key part of our outreach. In this issue
several writers of integrity present their views on the route choices
open to those who wish to achieve a sustainably just society. New
readers may be surprised at the passion invoked by the "split-rate"
approach route characterized by Josh Vincent and Steve Cord, working In
Pennsylvania and surrounding states. They are winning small victories
and a few big-thinking allies for Smart Tax reform.
Ken Wenzer and Messrs. Hyde and Hudson plump for the frontal assault.
They pour scorn on "accommodatist politicians" and those with "supine
reverence for property". Yet in a society where most voters are
homeowners, surely this is wise reverence? And have they mapped out for
us an alternative route towards the Single Tax goal? The political
landscape has changed since George bestrode it. The map needs updating.
The Pennsylvania pathway interests many whose attention is needed if
any progress is to be made towards our "very desirable long-term
goal" (Cord) of Single Tax. Nowhere do Cord and Vincent appear to "reject
single-tax philosophy": Wenzer himself admits that the road to the
Single Tax is "gradual if necessary".
TACTICS SHOULD not be mistaken for strategy. The goal is all important
-- but only for the mind's eye. Clear perspective for the next important
step must be the eyes' and the brain's constant focus. Apparently
short-term and trivial - even diversionary -- achievements must not
replace the true goal. But they may be necessary check-points, if only
because they attract attention to our wider programme. This doesn't mean
the perpetrators have "promoted an alternative vision" or
changed their motivation.
The split-rate at local level may leave the overall tax burden "substantially
unchanged in either amount or incidence" (Hudson & Hyde) but it
is not the endgame. It is at least arguable that it has taken the cause
forward.
Few politicians like unproven policies that frighten the horses'. The
next election has to be won. There are not going to be revolutions, sad
as it may seem to some! While debating the remote possibility of a
perfect but uncharted future, how many worthwhile imperfect
opportunities will be missed?
Whatever form The Smart Tax takes (and it need be neither local nor
split-rate), and however gradual the progress, In many countries (like
Britain) there first has to be a land valuation. It won't happen
overnight and it will take national legislation and the active
collaboration of technocrats and administrators with little interest in
grand visions.
The evidence from my own research is that such people expect major
property tax reform to be piloted locally before any national decision.
Our Progressive Forum is bringing together a potent mixture of those
with the vision and those with the means to "progress" it.
Those with vision must pass it on. But we must also find the means to
achieve it, one step at a time - big steps where possible, but small
will do. As Voltaire said: "The best is the enemy of the good".
"Smart" may not mean "best" but the split rate tax
is doing good. Can we do better, where we each are? Only by trying --
through action research -- will we find out.
|