.
Coordinating and Promoting the
Georgeist Movement |
| [Reprinted from Land
and Freedom, May-June 1942] |
I. The Need for Public Relations
No current program of economic reform suffers so much from the
opprobrium of being dated as does the single tax. No program has had so
much money spent on it fruitlessly; and yet no movement has had to rely
so much on volunteer workers, as has the Georgeist movement. And
probably no movement has had so many individual units working, not only
uncooperatively, but actually against one another.
It will be the purpose of this series of articles to seek some common
ground on which the various Georgeist enterprises in the United States
can work together; and to discover the best professional promotional
means by which each individual unit can make more headway.
Single tax writers speak constantly of the possibilities of .economic
cooperation in a free economy and of the abundant flow of goods in a
free market. But the single tax movement itself maintains an air of
snobbery and is conspicuously lacking in the art of selling its
doctrines in the open market of ideas.
Before me are two large folders containing pamphlets and propaganda of
various groups. One folder I have labelled "Ism Groups" and
the other "Pro-Democracy Groups." (Perhaps some Georgeists
would have placed some of my selections for the latter into the former
category. But I believe I have based my choice on Henry George's
conception of democracy.)
In the "Ism" folder can be found the voices of destruction to
a free society -- the Winrods, the Pelleys, the Huey Longs, the America
Firsters, the Hearsts, the Albert Jay Nocks, the Ku Klux Klans, the
Protestant Veterans of Foreign Wars, the Father Coughlins, the George
Seldes, the Deatherages, the Dillings, and the Reynolds -- and the
super-patriots of the "Buy United States" variety. These are
my "Ism" choices -- those who would divide and conquer with
Hitler in Europe and the Farmers' Viligantes in America. They are clever
publicists. They get, and maintain, huge memberships for their movements
through their rabble-rousing press.
In the "Pro-Democracy" folder are such agencies as the
Council for Democracy, Friends of Democracy, Freedom House, Twentieth
Century Fund, Council Against Intolerance in America, the Consumer
Cooperative movement, and many grant-in-aid foundations.
I don't propose to spend much time on the "ism" groups. The
Department of Justice, in the capable hands of Biddle and Arnold --
different men from the witch-hunting Palmer of World War I days -- is
wisely letting the "Isms" hang themselves with their own rope.
What I propose is to show how effectively the pro-democracy groups, many
of them with far less resources than the Georgeist movement, have been
able to marshal members and workers, simply because their leadership was
intelligent enough to use highly developed modern methods of
communication and demand professional talent.
The first World War enhanced a propaganda business used for war
purposes that was to become an influence on our material way of life in
the twenties. Stuart Chase, in "The Road We Are Traveling"
(Twentieth Century Fund, 1942), says: "Out of propaganda
techniques, designed to confound the enemy and bolster the faithful, was
to come much of the high-pressure advertising of the 1920's." And
this enlarged field of advertising became so important to our economy
that men and women were offered complete four-year courses in the
subject in our leading universities. The opening of new media of
communication and entertainment offered new resources for public
relations. The printed word did not lose its effectiveness, but now that
it had the competition of radio and motion pictures, those in its employ
had to sharpen their wits.
This sudden expansion of communication and advertising boomed commerce.
But non-commercial institutions did not remain unaware of the trend. The
new order of public relations was utilized by foundations, colleges,
schools. Great publicity agencies sprang up, devoted to handling only
the promotional needs of non-commercial organizations.
Thus, social service on a wide scale not only became known to the
public, but was in a position, through the huge funds collected by
scientifically promoted campaigns, to render unusual aid to mankind.
Sustained public relations, some of them costly, but paid for by
millions of contributors, have made effective the work of hundreds of
social agencies. Through this work, mortality from tuberculosis, for
instance, has taken a great drop, despite the increased tension of urban
living; sufferers of infantile paralysis get more intelligent care; huge
youth organizations -- the Boy Scouts, the Girl Scouts, the 4-H Crabs --
have contributed remarkably to responsible American citizenship; the
Birth Control Federation of America has taught planned parenthood to a
large segment of the people.
A brief examination of Georgeist literature reveals the fact that we
have not learned to use the techniques of public relations that now
dominate the field.
My files yield a copious quantity of Georgeist literature. A scrapbook
that is over thirty-five years old brings back the nostalgia of single
tax political campaigns. The generous expenditures of Joseph Fels are
represented in the Ohio, Oregon and other state-wide campaigns of yore.
Gradually there is a simmering off. The political campaigns quiet down.
Henry George's books disappear from the stores as they run out of print.
Then Robert Schalkenbach's bequest is made, and the Foundation
established in his name publishes George's works again, circularizes
bookstores, libraries and educational institutions. Then Oscar Geiger,
seeking to hold the sustained interest and enthusiasm of men of good
will, founds the Henry George School of Social Science.
With the coming of the depression, intelligent people realized that our
country could not continue on its doddering economic way, and they
turned to a study of the social scene. Colleges and schools reported a
higher enrollment in social science courses than at any other previous
period -- and new courses in government, economics, finance, etc., were
offered. Young men and women wanted to see what made the social
structure work.
As more and more became aware of their responsibility in governmental
and social affairs, only a few were drawn to the Georgeist philosophy
through our schools and organizations. We were not "in the swim."
Opportunities constantly present. themselves that the Georgeist
movement could make use of through experienced and professional public
relations. At the recent Carnival of Democracy at Grand Central Palace
in New York, many progressive and democratic groups were represented --
but no Georgeist group. In the panorama of world progress presented at
the World's Fair in 1939 and 1940 a comparatively small investment would
have brought our movement before millions of people -- but we were not
there. There will be more such opportunities in the future. Will a
coordinated Georgeist movement take advantage of them? Or will small
uncoordinated groups be content to busy themselves with "all they
can handle?"
Radio is the greatest medium for sustained salesmanship known to man.
One or two Georgeist attempts were made -- poorly prepared, badly
received programs. The motion picture is the most dynamic means of spot
Salesmanship known. The Georgeist movement has not welcomed this medium.
The professional lecturer is more popular than ever -- but we have
practically none. We do have plenty of pamphlets, but these are of value
only when backed up by sustained public relations. In short, the whole
field of professional public relations is practically unknown to the
Georgeist movement.
Hitler applied American promotional techniques to his own purposes,
assigning Goebbels to the task. He knew that America had perfected the
field of promotion and public relations. Do the Georgeists realize as
much?
|