.
A Plan for a National Land Policy |
| [Reprinted from Land
and Freedom, March-April 1942] |
THE bottleneck of land speculation which is preventing the production
of the "guns and butter" necessary for National Defense and
civilians, is proving such a tough problem, that there is just a
possibility that one or more of our leaders in government or industry
may take the bit in their teeth. There are already indications that our
leaders are awakening to the magnitude of the problem.
President Roosevelt's recent remarks about our "Cliveden set"
is a straw, not without much deeper significance than the press let on.
Mrs. Roosevelt has recently broadcast that special privilege must go.
Henry Ford has frequently urged, through the press, that idle land be
taxed more heavily than land in use. John Carmody has resigned as head
of Federal Works Agency and Nathan Straus has resigned as head of U. S.
Housing Authority; in both cases it is said that land speculators were
after their scalps because they would not submit to certain schemes.
Vice-President Wallace has said, "Sometimes I think land
speculation is a plague more terrible than drought and insect pests, and
almost as bad as war itself."
Secretary of Agriculture Wickard devotes many pages in his 1941 Report
to "land speculation" and "taxation of land values,"
and points out clearly how to deal with the problem. Secretary of the
Interior Ickes, in his 1941 Report, tells of the new office for "Land
Utilization" (created by Order No. 1466, issued April 15, 1940),
with the "over-all view of administering and developing the natural
resources of the nation at the highest possible level of efficiency and
economy."
While our leaders are casting about for an orderly land policy, they
might ponder the example already set by Boulder City, Nevada. In 1928
the Congress (in 45 Stat. 1057) entrusted the Department of the Interior
with the duty of holding the title to all land in Boulder City,
alongside the great Boulder Dam, and charging ground rent to those
wishing business or home locations in that little city. It was believed
at the time by Congress that Boulder City would virtually cease to exist
when the workmen engaged to build this great project finished that job.
Because of this fact, and also the fact that it was not suspected that
any real estate boomers could find people willing to "buy" any
lots in such ah obviously temporary community, no lobby thought the
measure of enough importance to oppose it.
But Dr. Elwood Mead, the then Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation
and the man who had the land tenure provision inserted in this statute,
must have had a very definite Idea in mind when he advocated it. A short
time before he had been called for consultation by the Government of
Australia in connection with their reclamation schemes and while in
Australia it was on Dr. Mead's suggestion largely, if not wholly, that
their new capital city of Canberra adopted the policy of land tenure
which our Congress enacted in the case of Boulder City, Nevada. The law
permitted leases for not over ten years, when first enacted. But despite
this fact, virtually all of the houses, store buildings, hotels, movies,
etc., in this model city are privately owned. The fact that homeseekers
could not get longer than a ten-year lease did not deter them at all. At
the end of the first ten years, instead of amending the law to permit
persons to "buy" land, in the usual way, the Congress
re-affirmed the policy as in the act from the beginning, and permitted
renewal of old leases, and new leases for not to exceed fifty-four
years, subject to periodical adjustments.
This land tenure policy has enabled the community to keep out gambling,
which is wide open in nearby Las Vegas. There are no billboards, hot dog
stands or anything of the sort to offend in this truly "spotless
town."
Persons desiring to build, for any purpose permitted, deal directly
with the City Manager, and pick out the location desired, as one selects
seats at a theater ticket window. No "ransom" has to be paid
any speculator.
Boulder City has attracted many persons of culture and means, because
of the added fact that Nevada has no income, sales or inheritance taxes,
and Boulder City is proving a mecca for the seekers of security.
On February 3, 1942, President Roosevelt sent a new bill to the
Congress (H.R. 6522) : "An act to prevent speculation in lands in
the Columbia Basin prospectively irrigable by reason of the construction
of the Grand Coulee Dam project and to aid actual settlers in securing
such lands at the fair appraised value thereof as arid land, and for
other purposes."
This Act is the product of five years' study by some sixty groups of
federal, state, railroad, Chamber of Commerce and real estate groups,
which President Roosevelt had urged in 1937 to draft legislation that
would absolutely prevent speculation in the more than one million acres
in this project. The Act, as now drafted, would permit the Secretary of
the Interior to acquire the title to land now in the hands of private
persons or companies, and after the government acquires the title, to "sell
or lease" it to homeseekers, etc. There are some safeguards, during
the first ten years, but the bill does not now really "prevent"
speculation in these lands. Every person interested in effectively
checking land speculation is earnestly urged to write at once to his
Representative or Senator in Washington for a copy of H.R. 6522, which
has. been referred to the Committee on Irrigation and Reclamation, and
also to write the Chairman of that Committee his views, if he is unable
to attend any of the Hearings, and ask to be sent a copy of the
Hearings.
The policy adopted in H.R. 6522 is of far greater importance than may
at first appear. This because the federal government is engaged in a
similar great project in California, the "Central Valley project,"
and there are, and doubtless will be, many more in other parts of the
nation, which will likely follow the pattern established in H.R. 6522.
With the precedent of Boulder City and its land tenure policy having
been twice approved by the Congress, it is proper to ask your
Congressman why H.R. 6522 should not contain the same policy and
principles. By taking an active interest in this pending law, the
opportunity so many have been hoping for may be gratified. Here is "action"
on a silver platter.
|