Daly,
Herman

ENLARGE
|
Herman Daly is professor of economics in the School of
Public Affairs, University of Maryland. The following excerpts are
from a speech delivered 30 April 2002 at the World Bank:
Value added belongs to whoever
added it. But the original value of that to which further value is
added by labor and capital should belong to everyone. Scarcity rents
to natural services, nature's value added, should be the focus of
redistributive efforts. Rent is by definition a payment in excess of
necessary supply price, and from the point of market efficiency is
the least distorting source of public revenue.
Appeals to the generosity of those who have added much value by
their labor and capital are more legitimate as private charity than
as a foundation for fairness in public policy. Taxation of value
added by labor and capital is certainly legitimate. But it is both
more legitimate and less necessary after we have, as much as
possible, captured natural resource rents for public revenue.
The above reasoning reflects the basic insight of Henry George,
extending it from land to natural resources in general. Neoclassical
economists have greatly obfuscated this simple insight by their
refusal to recognize the productive contribution of nature in
providing "that to which value is added". In their defense
it could be argued that this was so because in the past economists
considered nature to be non-scarce, but now they are beginning to
reckon the scarcity of nature and enclose it in the market. Let us
be glad of this, and encourage it further.
The modern form of the Georgist insight is to tax the resources and
services of nature (those scarce things left out of both the
production function and GDP accounts) -- and to use these funds for
fighting poverty and for financing public goods. Or we could simply
disburse to the general public the earnings from a trust fund
created by these rents, as in the Alaska Permanent Fund, which is
perhaps the best existing institutionalization of the Georgist
principle. Taking away by taxation the value added by individuals
from applying their own labor and capital creates resentment. Taxing
away value that no one added, scarcity rents on nature¹s
contribution, does not create resentment. In fact, failing to tax
away the scarcity rents to nature and letting them accrue as
unearned income to favored individuals has long been a primary
source of resentment and social conflict. |
Darrow,
Clarence
(1859-1938)

ENLARGE
|
Darrow, an attorney in the United States, made his
reputation, in part, by his defense of a schoolteacher who dared to
teach the scientific basis for evolution to students in a Southern
school. Of Henry George, Darrow wrote:
Henry George was one of the real
prophets of the world; one of the seers of the world. ...His was a
wonderful mind; he saw a question from every side. ...When we learn
that the value or land belongs to all of us, then we will be free
men -- no need to legislate to keep men and women from working
themselves to death; no need to legislate against the white slave
traffic. ...The "single tax" is so simple, so fundamental
and so easy to carry into effect that I have no doubt that it will
be about the last land reform the world will ever get. People in
this world are not often logical. |
Darrow,
Clarence
|
The single tax is so simple, so
fundamental, and so easy to carry into effect that I have no doubt
that it will be about the last land reform the world will ever get.
|
Davenport,
Herbert J.

ENLARGE
|
It is obvous that the bare land
with its contents and the waters that flow through and about it
constitute the nature-provided environment of human beings and are
rightly the subject of their equal claims. Also that the
value-for-use of these natural resources is conditioned on
population. It follows populaton as its shadow. It appears with the
people and disappears when they go. This value, therefore, should,
by the best of titles, be retained by the community as its most
excellent source of public revenue. The more the community draws
upon this vast, community-conditioned fund the less will be the
forced contributions from labour and capital. this means that the
greater and better distributed wil be the purchasing power of the
people..
[H.J. Davenport, Professor of Economics,
Cornell University] |
Day,
Alan
(Professor) |
It is arguable that the whole of
the rent of land, or alternatively, of the capitalised value of
rents, could be taxed away and yet the community would not suffer.
In this respect land is different from the other factors of
production.
[From comments made at a Colloquium on Land
Values held in London, March, 1965. Professor Day taught at the
London School of Economics from 1949 to. 1983. ] |
Deakin,
Alfred
(1857-1919)

ENLARGE
|
The whole of the people have the
right to the ownership of land and the right to share in the value
of land itslef, though not to share in the fruits of land which
properly belong to the individuals by whose labour they are
produced.
[Australian Prime Minister] |
Dewey,
John
(1859-1952)

ENLARGE
|
Dewey is considered to have possessed one of the great
minds of the twentieth century. His ideas regarding education were
and are controversial, if often misrepresented by opponents. In the
early 1930s, Dewey became the first honorary president of the Henry
George School of Social Science in New York City. His attachment to
the ideas of Henry George was life-long:
Henry George is one of the great
names among the world's social philosophers. It would require less
than the fingers of the two hands to enumerate those who, from Plato
down, rank with him. ... No man, no graduate of a higher educational
institution has a right to regard himself as educated in social
thought unless he has some firsthand acquaintance with the
theoretical contribution of this great American thinker.
|
Douglas,
Paul

ENLARGE
|
We ask only that the men and
women who make up society should be allowed to share in the
increases in value which their presence and productivity have
created. Unless there is such a public awareness and commitment, we
shall repeat the history of the past and permit those who sit tight
and hold on to a scarce factor of production to reap a large part of
the product created by others. We are becoming properly aware of the
need for land reform in the countrysides of Asia and Latin America.
There is an even greater need for land reform in the cities and
suburbs all over the world -- our own country included.
[U.S. Senator from Illinois and
Chairman, U.S. Natinal Commission on Urban Problems, 1968]
|
Dove,
Patrick Edward |
Patrick
Edward Dove, a Scotchman, was the most remarkable anticipator of
Henry George. In 1850 he published anonomously The Theory of
Human Progression, and Natural Probability of a Reign of Justice.
This is a diffuse work largely taken up with philosophical and
theologial specualation; economic problems hardly seem to be the
main issue. However, Dove referred to the land question as "the
main question of England's welfare."
How comes it that,
notwithstanding man's vast achievements, his wonderful efforts of
mechanical ingenuity, and the amazing productions of his skill, ...
a large portion of the population is reduce to pauperism? ...To
charge the poverty of man on God, is to blaspheme the Creator. ...He
has given enough, abundance, more than sufficient; and if man has
not enough, we must look to the mode in which God's gifts have been
distributed.
[from: The Theory of Human
Progression, pp. 322, 320, 387]
Dove diagnosed the cause of poverty as the denial of the
natural right of all to the land of their birth, "the
alienation of the soil form the state, and the consequent taxation
of the industry of the country."
Dove believed that the actual division of the land, even if
possible, would be futile as a remedy. The solution was to be found
in "the division of its annual value or rent," which could
best be done "by taking the whole of the taxes out of the rents
of the soil, and thereby abolishing all other kinds of taxation
whatever." If this were done "all industry would be
absolutely emancipated from every burden, and every man would reap
such natural reward as his skill, industry, or enterprise rendered
legitimately his, according to the natural law of free competition."
"The
rent of any one portion of soil does not depend on the labour or
capital that has been expended on that portion. ...For instance, if,
in the heart of London, a space of twenty acres had been enclosed by
a high wall at the time of the Norman Conquest, and if no man had
ever touched that portion of soil," or even seen it from that
time to this, it would, if let by auction, produce an enormously
high rent."
[Patrick Edwrd Dove, Elements of Political Science (1854),
p. 283]
"Political economists have insisted
much on the small matters that affect the value of labour. By far
the most important is the mode in which the land is distributed.
Wherever there is a free soil, labour maintains its value. Wherever
the soil is in the hands of a few proprietors, or tied up by
entails, labour necessarily undergoes depreciation. In fact, it is
the disposition of the land that determines the value of labour. If
men could get the land to labour on, they would manufacture only for
a remuneration that afforded more profit than God has attached to
the cultivation of the earth. Where they cannot get the land to
labour on, they are starved into working for a bare subsistence."
[Patrick Edward DOVE, Theory of Human Progression (1850),
p. 406 n]
|
Dove,
Patrick Edward |
We are fully aware that there
exists in the minds of many persons a vague apprehension, tht if the
present laws relating to landed property were to be disturbed, evils
of the most malignant character would invade the society of Britain.
Nothing could be more absurd, more puerile, more dastardly. The very
same fears have prevailed with regard to every other change that has
taken place.
[From: Theory of Human Progression
(1850), Chap. III., Sec. 3, pp. 294-5 (Edition of 1895)]
|
Dove,
Patrick Edward |
The great social problem, then,
that cannot fail ere long to appear in the arena of European
discussion is, "to discover such a system as shall secure to
every man his exact share of the natural advantages which the
Creator has provided for the race; while, at the same time, he has
full opportunity, iwhtout let or hindrance, to exercise his skill,
industry, and perseverance for his own advantage."
[From: Theory of Human Progression
(1850), Chap. III., Sec. 3, p. 305]
|
Dove,
Patrick Edward |
Let it be observed that when
land is taxed, no man is taxed; for the land produces, according to
the law of the Creator, more than the value of the labor expended on
it, and on this account men are willing to pay a rent for land.
[From: Theory of Human Progression
(1850), Chap. I., Sec. 2, p. 44 (American Edition of 1895)]
|
Downs,
Anthony

ENLARGE
|
Anthony Downs is a Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution
and member of the HUD Commission on Regulatory Barriers to
Affordable Housing.
We should make a fuller case for
stronger land taxation as a means of reducing housing costs.
[Source not known]
There has been too much money
flowing into real estate and that this excessive cash flow has
created many money-driven rather than demand-driven markets.
[From: "Tax Reform: What About Real
Estate?," Urban Land, August, 1985, p. 14.] |
Downs,
Anthony
and
Stanley,
Knighton |
This seemingly modest reform [a
2-rate building-to-land property tax shift] enabled Pittsburgh,
Scranton, Harrisburg and a dozen smaller cities to keep housing
costs down, and renew and revive blighted neighborhoods. These
activities, in turn, unlocked job opportunities. If the District [of
Columbia] went to a split-rate [2-rate] system, the experience in
Pennsylvania cities indicates that: (a) homes and apartments on
average would enjoy lower taxes; (b) owners of vacant lots and
blighted buildings would pay substantially higher taxes; and (c)
poor precincts would reap the proportionately greatest reductions.
[Washington Post, 24 September, 1995,
p.C.8] |
Durning,
Alan

ENLARGE
|
Taxes on income, payroll,
property and retail sales discourage entrepreneurship, hiring,
investment, savings and work ... they also encourage sprawl,
depletion of natural resources and pollution of land, air and water.
...They could be replaced with taxes on land values and on actions
that pollute, deplete or destroy habitat.
[From: "This Place on Earth"
(1996)]

|
East,
Ronald

ENLARGE
|
We have gone wrong on the land
question, and everything else has gone wrong automatically. I
believe that there is no greater or more urgent task of leadership
for the engineer than to help the community to a clear understanding
of the simple economic laws that govern distribution of benefits
from human activities.
[The source of the quote is not know. SCI
believes this comes from Ronald East, who served Australia as
President of the Institution of Engineers in the 1950s with an
expertise on water usage] |
Eckert,
Charles |
Now, what about tax on land
values? We have observed that land values are the result of
community growth and advancing civilization. They do not come into
being as a result of the activity of any particular individual, but
by the activity of all the people functioning as a social organism.
Therefore, since no particular individual is responsible for the
origin and growth of land values, but are due to the activity of all
the people, it is clear that the profits issuing from land values
belong to all the people.
[Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
during the 1930s, and one-time President of the Henry George
Foundation of America] |
ECONOMIST
MAGAZINE |
By cutting taxes on labour,
governments can remove one disincentive to join the job market; by
cutting taxes on capital, one disincentive to save.
But by taxing the use of natural resources -- be they oil, or
cadium, or the dirt-absorbing capacity of the atmosphere --
governments can not only pay for lower taxes on labour and saving;
they can also make markets work better, by ensuring that prices
reflect the full costs of economic activity.
[From: The Economist, May 5, 1990]
|
Einstein,
Albert
(1879-1955)

ENLARGE
|
I have already read Henry
George's great book and really learnt a great deal from it.
Yesterday evening I read with admiration -- the address about Moses.
Men like Henry George are rare, unfortunately. One cannot imagine a
more beautiful combination of intellectual keenness, artistic form,
and fervent love of justice. Every line is written as if for our
generation. The spreading of these works is a really deserving
cause, for our generation especially has many and important things
to learn from Henry George.
[From: a letter to a Pennsylvania women in
response to a letter inquiring whether Einstein had read Progress
and Poverty, 1931. A copy of this letter is available in the SCI
library]
|
Eisenhower,
Dwight D.
(1890-1969)

ENLARGE
|
At the end of the Second World War, Eisenhower held a
unique vision of the future, one that would ensure both peace and
prosperity. He asked:
Why the world's resources could
not be internationalized, since raw materials represented the
world's basic needs, they should belong to and serve everybody.
[From: Blanche Cook. The Declassified
Eisenhower, 1985, p.229] |
Ely,
Richard T. |
One of the factors leading to
the confusion which has surrounded the taxation of land values is
the old theory of economic rent. Those who hold this theory regard
land income as the result of the spontaneous action of nature and
land values as the consequence of the niggardliness of nature in
failing to provide an adequate supply of land in relation to man's
need for it. Economic evoluton has disproved many of the hypotheses
on which the Richardian theory of rent is based. ...The concept of
economic relativity must lead us to draw up plans for the taxation
of land vlaues which will meet the needs of different times and of
different places.
[From: "Taxing Land Values and Taxing
Building Values," The Annals of The American Academy of
Political and Social Science, Vol. CXLVIII, No. 237, March,
1930, p.169] |
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo

ENLARGE
|
Whilst another man has no land,
my title to mine, and your title to yours, is at once vitiated.
[source not identified] |
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
As I am born to the earth, so
the earth is given to me, what I want of it to till and to plant;
nor could I without pusillanimity omit to claim so much.
[From: The Conservative, A
Lecture delivered at the Masonic Temple, Boston, December 9, 1841]
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
Grimly the same spirit (of
progress) looks into the law of property and accuses men of driving
a trade in the great, boundless providence which has given the air,
the water and the land to men to use and not to fence in and
monopolize.
[From: On the Times (1841)]
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
I find this vast net-work, which
you call property, extending over the whole planet. I cannot occupy
the bleakest crag of the White Hills or the Allegheny Range, but
some man or corporation steps up to me to show me that it is his.
[From: The Conservative, A Lecture
delivered at the Masonic Temple, Boston, December 9, 1841]
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
Then he says: "If I am born
into the earth, where is my part? Have the goodness, gentlemen of
this world, to show me my wood lot, where I may fell my wood, my
field where to plant my corn, my pleasant ground where to build my
cabin." ..."Touch any wood or field or house-lot on your
peril," cry all the gentlemen of this world; "but you may
come and work in ours for us, and we will give you a peice of bread."
[From: The Conservative, A Lecture
delivered at the Masonic Temple, Boston, December 9, 1841]
|
Erskine,
John

ENLARGE
|
I would say that the single tax
theories of Henry George have always seemed to me unanswerable, and
I believe that when we have tried other forms of taxation long
enough to be convinced of their injustice -- and I don't know how
many centuries that will take -- we shall be ready for his simple
and convincing ideas.
[John Erskine was a professor of english at
Columbia University. During the 1920s he introduced a "great
books" program, writing: If the faculty believed that the
boys in college ought to be familiar with more than the titles of
great books, that happy result could be achieved in a new kind of
course, extending through two years, preferably the junior and
senior years, and devoted to the simple principle of reading one
great book a week, and discussing it in a weekly meeting which would
last two or three hours.] |
Evans,
George Henry

ENLARGE
|
"Evans subscribed to the
idea that property rights derived their legitimacy from the right of
every human being to himself and the fruits of his labor. But land
was the gift of God, not the product of toil. It followed that 'the
land should not be a matter of traffic, gift, or will' and
government's duty to preserve natural rights entailed a duty to
regulate land tenure for the common good. 'If any man has a right on
earth, he has a right to land enough to raise a habitation on,'
Evans wrote in 1841. 'If he has a right to live, he has a right to
land enough for his subsistance. Deprive anyone of these rights, and
you place him at the mercy of those who possess them.' National
Reformers claimed that the doctrine of natural rights provided both
a diagnosis and a cure for the crisis of republican government in
America -- a crisis manifested by 'the haggard, care-worn
countennace of the daily laborer, the wasting form of the overtasked
seastress . . . [and] the squalid children trained to beggary and
deceit.' The surplus of 'white slaves' caused by the mechanization
of labor meant that working people were rapidly losing the autonomy
necessary for responsible citizenship. 'By restoring his natural
right to the soil,' Evans insisted, 'the laborer would not be
dependent on the employer, and would consequently rise to his proper
rank in society.' All the people's representatives had to do was fix
a limit on the amount of land any individual might own."
[from: p. 172 of Charles McCurdy's Anti-Rent
Era in New York Politics: 1839-1865] |
|