.
Taxation Platform of the Ontario
Green Party -- 2006 |
| [Frank de Jong is
leader of the Green Party of Ontario, Canada. He can be contacted at
244 Gerrard St., East, Toronto, Ontario, M5A 2G2, www.gpo.ca] |
1.0.1 Taxation
1. Introduction
The Green Party believes that taxation is a tool that should be used to
achieve policy objectives. Resource use taxes and land value levies
should be used to provide incentives to businesses and citizens to
conserve energy and resources and to use land more efficiently. The
belief is that businesses and people will modify lifestyles and
purchasing habits to avoid taxation.
When in power, the Green Party will begin a partial, gradual, revenue
neutral tax shift from income, consumption and business taxes to
resource use taxes, pollution taxes and land value levies. This proposal
will not encourage or discourage economic activity but will reduce
sprawl and reduce industrial throughput. Industry, which follows the
path of tax resistance, will retool to take advantages of reduced
taxation on green technologies and processes.
As taxes are shifted from business and personal incomes to resources
and land, tax reduction should begin by raising the basic personal and
business exemption.
2. Terms and Assumptions
Green Tax Shifting: moving the source of government revenue from "earned"
income (labour, business activities, farming.) to "unearned"
income (use of land or resources), otherwise externalized costs
(pollution), and the use of community-owned features (billboards,
magnetic spectrum, air waves). Tax shifting is revenue-neutral, not a
tax reduction or tax increase.
Resource use Taxation: levies on the use of fossil fuels, minerals,
metals, aggregates, water, trees to encourage conservation, and levies
on pollution into air, soil, water to equal the damage done (know as
pigouvian taxes).
Land Value Taxation: a yearly charge on the assessed value of land
irrespective of improvements, buildings or use of the land within a
specific zoning. Since land values are community-generated, a percentage
of the economic rent produced by land should accrue to government
general revenue.
Economic Rent: the wealth generated by a resource monopoly in excess of
the cost of production minus a reasonable profit, or wealth generated by
land ownership in excess of the purchase price plus interest costs minus
a reasonable profit.
3. Concise Policy Points
1) It is better to tax "bads" rather than "goods".
2) Taxes should be designed to conserve resources and energy.
3) Taxes should be designed to increase employment.
4) Distributive taxes are preferable to re-distributive taxes.
5) Resource taxes should be applied early in production process.
6) Taxing unearned income is preferable to taxing earned income.
7) Green tax shifting is revenue-neutral, not a tax break or tax grab.
8) Resource use and community-generated land value taxation are fairer.
9) Green taxation increases international competitiveness.
10) Business and consumers should pay for what they take, not for what
they make.
11) Taxing community-generated land values is beneficial.
12) Taxes should encourage local, sustainable, value-added production
over imports.
13) Taxes should reduce monopolies and encourage wider ownership.
14) Taxes should be applied only once.
15) Income taxes and business taxes are green-neutral and should be
minimized.
16) Income and business taxes do not reduce economic inequity.
17) Consumption Taxes are green-neutral and should be phased out.
18) Resource use and land value taxation will reduce size of
underground economy.
4. Explanation of Each Policy Point
1) It is better to tax "bads" rather than "goods".
The GPO would employ selective "eco-sin taxes" to discourage a
wide range of grey production processes and lifestyles and reduce taxes
on greener manufacturing technology and lifestyles. People should have
the option to avoid taxation by choosing greener products and
lifestyles.
2) Taxes should be designed to conserve resources and energy. Rather
than taxing jobs and profits, taxes should be moved to resource use and
energy consumption to reward conservation. The community should benefit
from the use of commonly held resources. Using resources is a privilege,
not a right, and the user should pay for the privilege. Resources must
also be shared with future generations and other species.
3) Taxes should be designed to increase employment. Moving taxes onto
resources and land and off of incomes will make people less expensive to
employ and materials and energy more expensive. Products that tend to
use fewer resources and less energy and require more skilled labour will
avoid taxation. The resulting value-added production will generate more
jobs and more highly skilled jobs than resource intensive products
generate. Local sustainable production, short run niche production, and
skilled trades and crafts receive a bias as the full costs of
transportation and mass production are internalized.
4) Distributive taxes are preferable to re-distributive taxes. If
wealth is distributed more fairly in the first place less
re-distribution will be necessary. By moving taxes onto resource use and
land values, the poor, who generally own less land and use fewer
resources, will be subject to less taxation, thus requiring less
redistribution. Taxing land value but not the use of land will reduce
taxation on higher density housing, thus lowering housing costs for
lower-income citizens, and reducing another need for wealth
re-distribution.
5) Resource use taxes should be applied early in production process.
Resources should be taxed as they enter the manufacturing process in
order to green all aspects of the manufacturing process from extraction
to the finished product. Increasing taxes on resource and energy use
will encourage efficiency, innovation, reuse, repair, recycling, and
used material recovery.
6) Taxing unearned income is preferable to taxing earned income. The
tax shift to resource use and community-generated land values will
distribute income more fairly without dependence on income and business
taxation to redistribute income. Taxing unearned income (resource use,
land values) and not earned income (jobs, profits) will reduce the
rich-poor gap since the rich are always in a better position to capture
unearned or windfall income by their ability to hold assets in excess of
their needs.
7) Green tax shifting is revenue-neutral, not a tax break or tax grab.
The collective amount of tax paid by businesses and individuals will not
change, but greener businesses and consumers will enjoy tax relief.
Greyer businesses and consumers will incur higher taxes. Studies show
that 50% of businesses and consumers will be unaffected or only slightly
affected by tax shifting, while roughly one quarter will realize tax
reductions one quarter will be taxed more.
8) Resource use and community-generated land value taxation are fairer.
Resource use and land value levies are much simpler to collect and
harder to evade than taxes on incomes and on business profits. Moving to
resource use and land value taxation will reduce the size of the
underground economy as there are far fewer points of taxation. Also, the
difficulty of evading these taxes will reduce the problem of overseas
tax havens.
9) Green taxation increases international competitiveness. Moving taxes
off of domestic labour will reduce labour costs in Ontario and therefore
reduce out-sourcing by businesses seeking cheap labour in other
countries or provinces. Border tax adjustments can be set to account for
price differentials, particularly related to energy, that would
otherwise affect imports and exports.
10) Business and consumers should pay for what they take, not for what
they make. Businesses should not be taxed for hiring people or for
earning a profit, but should be charged for using resources and
polluting the planet. People should not be taxed for earning an income
or purchasing products but should be charged for the value of land they
own and the resources used in the products they buy. Using resources,
owning land, and polluting are privileges granted by communities, and
businesses and consumers should be charged a fee for these privileges.
11) Taxing community-generated land values is beneficial. Since the
community around it, not its owner, creates the value of land, the
community should receive the benefits it has created. The owner is
entitled to a fair profit but not to windfall profits that rightfully
belong to the community that generated the wealth in the first place.
Under LVT the specific use of the land will not be taxed, only the land
itself, within the existing zoning. Community-generated land value
taxation encourages the efficient use of land, reduces sprawl, reduces
speculation, tends to reduce land prices and improves land use patterns.
12) Taxes should encourage local, sustainable, value-added production
over imports. Culturally unique products and services will be given
price advantages by green tax reform over mass production and imports.
When sale prices include the true costs of products, services and
distances traveled, production will advantage local, sustainable
production.
13) Taxes should reduce monopolies and encourage wider ownership. When
an individual or a business controls or has exclusive rights to
resources or strategic parcels of land, this person or business often
reaps windfall profits, which is unfair to the larger community. Since
the value of resources and the value of land are created by the
community, when individuals are granted access to them, they should pay
a fair price for this privilege. Land value and resource use taxation
aims to ensure that the wealth generated by the value of land and
resources that rightfully belong to the community accrue back to that
community. With the recapture of windfall profits by the community there
is reduced speculative incentive for individuals or companies to
monopolize resources or land beyond their immediate needs.
14) Taxes should be applied only once. Rather than taxing the same
wealth repeatedly through personal income, business income, sales,
re-sale, interest, capital gains, property transfer, inheritance,.
taxation should only be levied on land values and on resource use. An
exception would be pollution taxes to encourage closed loop
manufacturing.
15) Income taxes and business taxes are green-neutral and should be
minimized. Income taxes and business taxes are counterproductive since
they tax a "good" not a "bad". Since jobs are
desirable we should not tax employment. Since we want businesses to be
successful we shouldn't tax businesses. Income taxes are a disincentive
to employment since they make people expensive to employ, and business
taxes are a disincentive for people to start businesses and make them
successful.
16) Income and business taxes do not reduce economic inequity. Since
labour bargaining is based on net pay, not gross pay, the amount of
income tax paid is irrelevant to labour negotiations. Salaries of
employees and CEOs are simply raised to the level necessary to ensure
net pay reaches the desired level. Employers and businesses simply pass
on the extra costs on to consumers. The rich-poor gap will be narrowed
more effectively by moving taxes off of incomes and onto resource use
and land value since wealthier people who choose to spend their money on
grey products and lifestyles will be taxed heavily while people with
lower incomes will have the option of avoiding taxation by greener
living.
17) Consumption Taxes are green-neutral and should be phased out. Sales
taxes are unhelpful in moving to a green society since socially useful
and ecologically sound products are taxed equally to socially or
ecologically detrimental products. Instead taxes should be applied as
early as possible in the manufacturing process in order to green more
aspects of the manufacturing process.
18) Resource use and land taxation will reduce size of the underground
economy. Roughly 20% of the economy is underground where people and
businesses avoid taxation through illegal behaviour that is both costly
to fight and not fair to those who pay their taxes. Resource use and
site value taxation are simpler to administer and more difficult to
evade since there are far fewer points of taxation and assessments are
less problematic.
|