.
| [Reprinted from Fragments,
July-September 1967] |
GEORGISM. WHAT is it? Is it a wild nightmare of madmen, is it
the last hope of the capitalists as Karl Marx sneered, or is it a
beautiful but hopeless dream of visionaries?
Let us see.
- Two, and only two, fundamentals exist - man and the universe (land).
The union of the two - man laboring on the land - gives birth to wealth,
those material things which man needs and desires not only to exist but
to help make life a magnificently fascinating experience.
- All men have equal rights to life. (Who can tell the king from the
peasant when they are naked?)
- Land is of unequal quality. (Succulent fruit-bearing land exists side
by side with worthless deserts.)
- Land is freely given to all men. (When did Mother Nature give a title
deed to the land, or portion thereof, to any man, no matter how
exalted?)
- Two men cannot occupy the same portion of the earth at the same time.
The contradictions here posed create a problem which men must solve if
harmony is to prevail. Men need land on which and from which to live,
but land is of unequal opportunity. At the same time, while all are
equally entitled to any portion of the land, no two men can occupy the
same portion at the same time. So, man has the problem of dividing up
the unequal opportunities of the land among the equal claimants to them
with justice to all.
The solution is readily apparent if one is not afraid to abandon old
habits of thought. The principle involved is the same as that used in
apportioning the seats in a theatre where the best seats in a theatre go
to the highest bidders. All the people need do is to act collectively in
small groups, as New England Town Governments do and publicly auction
the land among themselves periodically - annually, biennially, or for
whatever time-period is desired. The land will thus be divided according
to the people's willingness and ability to pay the rent, with the best
land going to those paying the most rent.
This rent belongs to all the people, for only the people justly own the
land - not those now called the owners. (Neither man nor land can ever
justly be treated as private property. Everything else, that is,
everything which human beings make, is private property, whether it be a
simple spade or a mighty blast furnace or skyscraper.) As the rent
belongs to all, the Town Hall Governments need only divide it among the
inhabitants in their areas on a per capita basis.
To recapitulate: If men act in concert to lease the land to those
desiring it, and will then disburse the rent equally among themselves,
they will have realized the condition of land which is freely available
to all, taking into account the fact that two things cannot occupy the
same place at the same time and that land is of unequal opportunity. The
individual renting a piece of land compensates all other men for their
claims to it through his payment of the rent to the community. As all
have an equal opportunity to bid for it and willingly forego their
claims to this highest bidder, justice is maintained.
With the rent going into a common kitty, which is then divided equally
among all the people, everyone is recompensed for permitting some men
actually to have control over the use of the land for a stated period of
time.
In its broadest sense, land represents not merely access to the gifts
of Nature, but the opportunity to utilize one's capacities. Only a
relatively few would actually want control of land, but as long as it is
all freely available, it represents an irreducible minimum to which
anyone can resort, if necessary.
With the man-made barrier of private property in land eliminated, the
primary industries, as agriculture and mining, tend to produce at the
maximum men desire. This causes increased production in the secondary
industries, as manufacturing and transportation, and also requires
increased services from the financial and banking fields, as well as
from the arts and sciences. With production and services tending to a
maximum, employment opportunities will be so numerous that people will
readily find the type best suited to their capacities.
The twin cancers which have afflicted all societies down through the
ages have been private property in man and in land. When either or both
evils exist, society eventually crumbles for justice will not tolerate
evil.
Georgism naturally is anti-statist. However, it recognizes that the
anarchist is in error, for man does need government. But he needs it not
for protection, road building or education for these are all functions
of private enterprise. He needs government for one reason, and one
reason only - to divide up the land among the equal claimants to it with
justice to all. Government is founded on two laws of Nature, one
physical, the other ethical. The physical law is that two things cannot
occupy the same place at the same time while the ethical law is that all
men have equal rights to the land. It is for the resolution of this
contradiction that men must create government.
But Georgism, while recognizing the need for government, also is
cognizant of the fact that men cannot act together collectively and
still maintain justice if the number of men is large, or the extent of
land too great. Government must be barely above the family level - on
the order of the New England Town Hall Governments, with the land area
small enough so that all members of the community can be acquainted with
it. To put it simply, Georgism recognizes that men live in an ordered
universe. For them to live in harmony with one another freedom is the
great desideratum - freedom from those corruptions of government called
States; freedom for all men to do as they please as long as they do not
interfere with one another's equal rights.
Man - laborer - is the father. Land - opportunity - is the mother. The
union of the two under the milieu of justice enables man to give birth
to myraid creations of his individuality; and for those creations to be
the highest to which he dare aspire, both man himself and the land must
be free.
|