.
| [Reprinted from The
Gargoyle, May 1971] |
Daily there are increasing signs that a renaissance in our knowledge
and understanding of the Indians and their culture is occurring. Whereas
previously, the Indians were the ban 'uns, and the white men were the
good people, new books, articles and shows are creating a different
picture, with the relative positions reversed.
Recently, a book, reviewer of a new book, "Bury My Heart at
Wounded Knee: An Indian History of the American West" by Dee Brown
pointed out that in general the Indians welcomed the white man.
Significantly what the Indian did not understand was the white man's
concepts about land. The Indians "knew that land came from the
Great Spirit, was as endless as the sky, and belonged to no man".
The white man, of course, coming from Europe where he had lost sight of
the fact that land was the common heritage of all men, considered land
to be property to be seized by whoever had the force to do so. For some
absurd reason, possibly because of lack of knowledge of the great
civilizations of the East, Europeans considered the white man as a
superior being. Possibly it was because his productivity in contrast to
other races of men was so great. Sitting Bull said "The White Man
knows how to make everything but he does not know how to distribute it."
That is a profound truth which even the dullest can recognize today.
The Indian was not a brutish savage. On the contrary, he had a vision
of the Great Spirit which rules the universe. He had a deep sense of
right and wrong, and his social arrangements were relatively
sophisticated.
That the white man infected the Indian morally as well as physically
has become obvious in the plight of many of those living today. The
white man lied and cheated the Indians. Treaties would be made ceding
land to the Indians which were to be honored in perpetuity. But,
naturally, whenever the white man wanted such land, the Indian was
dispossessed.
The amazing thing about the war of extermination which the white man
waged against the red man is the lack of appreciation of the Indian's
superior understanding of the land. Despite their constant statements on
how land should be treated the white man apparently never understood.
Chief Joseph of Nez Perce said: "I never said the land was mine to
do with it as I chose. The one who has the right to dispose of it is the
one who has created it. I claim a right to live on my land, and accord
you the privilege to live on yours."
Interestingly, the Indians were the earliest students of ecology. They
noticed the spoliation and pollution which the white man wrought. "Already
the once sweet-watered streams ... were clouded with silt and wastes of
man; the very earth was being ravaged and squandered."
Today, as though awakening from a nightmare, the white man has a sense
of guilt and is attempting to assuage his guilty conscience by a series
of actions which are questionable. In some cases, land is given over to
Indian tribes which have some claims to( it as their ancestral
territory. It becomes the private property of these tribes. This may
very well lead to serious problems, particularly if valuable resources
are found there. Surrounded by a white culture which considers land to
be the most sacred form of property, will the Indians act differently?
One offshoot of the white man's guilt feeling is his handling of claims
of the natives in Alaska today. Instead of ruthlessly ignoring them, an
attempt is being made to compensate them for lands taken from them.
Whether the solutions offered are wise or not, is a question. But, at
least, there is a recognition that the natives have rights to the land,
just as the white man.
To date, however, although there is increasing discussion of land
rights, no one seems to question the present system of land tenure. On
the contrary, all the solutions appear to be based on,, the fact that
land is assumed to be privately owned. Presumably the natives of Alaska
owned the land until the white man came. Since he had the greater
strength he grabbed it from them. But, the white man has matured
somewhat. He feels he must make some restitution so he makes an attempt
at compensation. And the native in accepting it, has in a subtle way
accepted the white man's concept of land tenure.
Possibly, however, this is a step in the right direction. For if more
and more discussion is devoted to land rights, possibly our entire
system of land tenure will come under the scrutiny of the people. At
least, if such is the case there is hope that some thing constructive
may come of it.
|