.
The Fallacy of the "Middle Way" |
| [Reprinted from Human
Events, Vol. VIII, No.19, 9 May, 1951] |
The resignation of Aneurin Bevan from the British Government poses a
question for so-called intellectuals who glibly advocate a "mixed
economy" -- partly Socialistic, partly free. Can it work? Bevan is
convinced it cannot. He and his group blame "austerity" on the
"mixture". The Atlee regime, they maintain, has failed because
it has been too timid, too reluctant to wipe out what is left of
Capitalism in England.
Bevan is logically sound as a nut. Capitalism and Socialism are so
antagonistic in texture that there is no way to make them mix. The one
is a way of life grounded in the axiom of private property; the other
denies the axiom out of hand. How can you have harmony in a social order
that accepts the axiom in some areas, rejects it in others?
When you reject private property, as an axiom, you have government
intervention and control. But, a social economy -- as distinguished from
a Robinson Crusoe economy -- is so meshed that it cannot be partly
controlled, partly free. When the government undertakes to fix prices it
is compelled to fix wages. Intervention in the meat business at the
butcher shop level leads to intervention at the slaughter house, then on
the farm, and when you follow through you come to the tannery and the
shoe business. Each control calls for control of contiguous areas in
order to make the previous control work.
Experience has shown that once Socialism pokes its foot into the door,
Capitalism is on its way out. A "mixed" economy is a temporary
concession to Capitalistic habits and traditions. Sevan's position is
this: since Capitalism is doomed, why not be done with concessions and
hurry the inevitable along? He is logical.
II
Now, if Socialism and Capitalism cannot be housed within a given
country without causing friction, can there be harmony in a world of
sovereign states, some Socialistic, some Capitalistic? Karl Marx said it
is impossible, and the "unmixed" Socialists have always stuck
by their Prophet. They sometimes disagree among themselves as to whether
evolution or revolution will ultimately wipe out world-Capitalism and
[remaining portion of this article is unfortunately not available]
|