.
Speech Before the United States
Congress |
Woman suffrage is inevitable. Suffragists knew it before November 4,
1917; opponents afterward. Three distinct causes made it inevitable.
First, the history of our country. Ours is a nation born of revolution,
of rebellion against a system of government so securely entrenched in
the customs and traditions of human society that in 1776 it seemed
impregnable. From the beginning of things, nations had been ruled by
kings and for kings, while the people served and paid the cost. The
American Revolutionists boldly proclaimed the heresies: "Taxation
without representation is tyranny." "Governments derive their
just powers from the consent of the governed." The colonists won,
and the nation which was established as a result of their victory has
held unfailingly that these two fundamental principles of democratic
government are not only the spiritual source of our national existence
but have been our chief historic pride and at all times the sheet anchor
of our liberties.
Eighty years after the Revolution, Abraham Lincoln welded those two
maxims into a new one: "Ours is a government of the people, by the
people, and for the people." Fifty years more passed and the
president of the United States, Woodrow Wilson, in a mighty crisis of
the nation, proclaimed to the world: "We are fighting for the
things which we have always carried nearest to our hearts: for
democracy, for the right of those who submit to authority to have a
voice in their own government."
All the way between these immortal aphorisms political leaders have
declared unabated faith in their truth. Not one American has arisen to
question their logic in the 141 years of our national existence. However
stupidly our country may have evaded the logical application at times,
it has never swerved from its devotion to the theory of democracy as
expressed by those two axioms...
With such a history behind it, how can our nation escape the logic it
has never failed to follow, when its last unenfranchised class calls for
the vote? Behold our Uncle Sam floating the banner with one hand, "Taxation
without representation is tyranny," and with the other seizing the
billions of dollars paid in taxes by women to whom he refuses "representation."
Behold him again, welcoming the boys of twenty-one and the newly made
immigrant citizen to "a voice in their own government" while
he denies that fundamental right of democracy to thousands of women
public school teachers from whom many of these men learn all they know
of citizenship and patriotism, to women college presidents, to women who
preach in our pulpits, interpret law in our courts, preside over our
hospitals, write books and magazines, and serve in every uplifting moral
and social enterprise. Is there a single man who can justify such
inequality of treatment, such outrageous discrimination? Not one...
Second, the suffrage for women already established in the United States
makes women suffrage for the nation inevitable. When Elihu Root, as
president of the American Society of International Law, at the eleventh
annual meeting in Washington, April 26, 1917, said, "The world
cannot be half democratic and half autocratic. It must be all democratic
or all Prussian. There can be no compromise," he voiced a general
truth. Precisely the same intuition has already taught the blindest and
most hostile foe of woman suffrage that our nation cannot long continue
a condition under which government in half its territory rests upon the
consent of half of the people and in the other half upon the consent of
all the people; a condition which grants representation to the taxed in
half of its territory and denies it in the other half a condition which
permits women in some states to share in the election of the president,
senators, and representatives and denies them that privilege in others.
It is too obvious to require demonstration that woman suffrage, now
covering half our territory, will eventually be ordained in all the
nation. No one will deny it. The only question left is when and how will
it be completely established.
Third, the leadership of the United States in world democracy compels
the enfranchisement of its own women. The maxims of the Declaration were
once called "fundamental principles of government." They are
now called "American principles" or even "Americanisms."
They have become the slogans of every movement toward political liberty
the world around, of every effort to widen the suffrage for men or women
in any land. Not a people, race, or class striving for freedom is there
anywhere in the world that has not made our axioms the chief weapon of
the struggle. More, all men and women the world around, with farsighted
vision into the verities of things, know that the world tragedy of our
day is not now being waged over the assassination of an archduke, nor
commercial competition, nor national ambitions, nor the freedom of the
seas. It is a death grapple between the forces which deny and those
which uphold the truths of the Declaration of Independence...
Do you realize that in no other country in the world with democratic
tendencies is suffrage so completely denied as in a considerable number
of our own states? There are thirteen black states where no suffrage for
women exists, and fourteen others where suffrage for women is more
limited than in many foreign countries.
Do you realize that when you ask women to take their cause to state
referendum you compel them to do this: that you drive women of
education, refinement, achievement, to beg men who cannot read for their
political freedom?
Do you realize that such anomalies as a college president asking her
janitor to give her a vote are overstraining the patience and driving
women to desperation?
Do you realize that women in increasing numbers indignantly resent the
long delay in their enfranchisement?
Your party platforms have pledged women suffrage. Then why not be
honest, frank friends of our cause, adopt it in reality as your own,
make it a party program, and "fight with us"? As a party
measure--a measure of all parties--why not put the amendment through
Congress and the legislatures? We shall all be better friends, we shall
have a happier nation, we women will be free to support loyally the
party of our choice, and we shall be far prouder of our history.
"There is one thing mightier than kings and armies"--aye,
than Congresses and political parties--"the power of an idea when
its time has come to move." The time for woman suffrage has come.
The woman's hour has struck. If parties prefer to postpone action longer
and thus do battle with this idea, they challenge the inevitable. The
idea will not perish; the party which opposes it may. Every delay, every
trick, every political dishonesty from now on will antagonize the women
of the land more and more, and when the party or parties which have so
delayed woman suffrage finally let it come, their sincerity will be
doubted and their appeal to the new voters will be met with suspicion.
This is the psychology of the situation. Can you afford the risk? Think
it over.
We know you will meet opposition. There are a few "women haters"
left, a few "old males of the tribe," as Vance Thompson calls
them, whose duty they believe it to be to keep women in the places they
have carefully picked out for them. Treitschke, made world famous by war
literature, said some years ago, "Germany, which knows all about
Germany and France, knows far better what is good for Alsace-Lorraine
than that miserable people can possibly know." A few American
Treitschkes we have who know better than women what is good for them.
There are women, too, with "slave souls" and "clinging
vines" for backbones. There are female dolls and male dandies. But
the world does not wait for such as these, nor does liberty pause to
heed the plaint of men and women with a grouch. She does not wait for
those who have a special interest to serve, nor a selfish reason for
depriving other people of freedom. Holding her torch aloft, liberty is
pointing the way onward and upward and saying to America, "Come."
To you and the supporters of our cause in Senate and House, and the
number is large, the suffragists of the nation express their grateful
thanks. This address is not meant for you. We are more truly
appreciative of all you have done than any words can express. We ask you
to make a last, hard fight for the amendment during the present session.
Since last we asked a vote on this amendment, your position has been
fortified by the addition to suffrage territory of Great Britain,
Canada, and New York.
Some of you have been too indifferent to give more than casual
attention to this question. It is worthy of your immediate
consideration. A question big enough to engage the attention of our
allies in wartime is too big a question for you to neglect.
Some of you have grown old in party service. Are you willing that those
who take your places by and by shall blame you for having failed to keep
pace with the world and thus having lost for them a party advantage? Is
there any real gain for you, for your party, for your nation by delay?
Do you want to drive the progressive men and women out of your party?
Some of you hold to the doctrine of states' rights as applying to woman
suffrage. Adherence to that theory will keep the United States far
behind all other democratic nations upon this question. A theory which
prevents a nation from keeping up with the trend of world progress
cannot be justified.
Gentlemen, we hereby petition you, our only designated representatives,
to redress our grievances by the immediate passage of the Federal
Suffrage Amendment and to use your influence to secure its ratification
in your own state, in order that the women of our nation may be endowed
with political freedom before the next presidential election, and that
our nation may resume its world leadership in democracy.
Woman suffrage is coming--you know it. Will you, Honorable Senators and
Members of the House of Representatives, help or hinder it?
|